In a year marked by dynamic market shifts, digital wealth managers, commonly known as robo-advisors, have demonstrated a notable ability to outperform the broader stock market. A comprehensive annual analysis by the consulting firm Fondsconsult reveals that offensive strategies, which fully invest in equities and do not adhere to sustainability mandates, achieved an average pre-fee return of 10.2 percent in 2025. This performance significantly outpaced the global MSCI All Country World Index (ACWI), which generated a return of 7.9 percent in Euro terms for the same period.
The robust performance of these automated investment platforms underscores their growing significance in the financial landscape. Robo-advisors, which leverage algorithms to construct personalized investment portfolios based on client preferences, primarily utilize exchange-traded funds (ETFs), traditional investment funds, and individual securities. In Germany alone, the market for robo-advisors is substantial, with estimates from ExtraETF suggesting that these platforms manage over 128 billion Euros. This impressive figure highlights a significant shift towards digital asset management among German investors.
Key Drivers of 2025 Performance
Several factors contributed to the strong showing of robo-advisors in 2025. A significant driver was the substantial allocation to gold within many of these portfolios. The price of the precious metal surged by an impressive 45 percent during the year, acting as a powerful performance enhancer for strategies that held significant gold positions. Maximilian Wellner, an analyst at Fondsconsult, noted that "some robo-advisors had up to 20 percent of their portfolios invested in gold. This naturally drove performance last year." This strategic inclusion of gold, often a safe-haven asset during times of market uncertainty, proved particularly effective in the volatile economic climate of 2025.

Beyond gold, other market trends also played a role. Minveo, for instance, identified gold as its strongest individual return driver for its offensive portfolio. The company also cited the performance of momentum stocks and an alternative country weighting strategy as beneficial factors. This suggests a sophisticated approach by some robo-advisors in identifying and capitalizing on specific market movements and asset classes.
Divergent Performance Across Strategies
While the average performance was strong, the analysis by Fondsconsult also highlighted significant variations in returns among different robo-advisor strategies. This underscores the importance of investor due diligence in selecting the right platform and strategy aligned with their risk tolerance and financial goals.
Fondsconsult evaluated over two dozen strategies from 17 providers available in Germany. While acknowledging that the reliance on provider data means the study may not encompass every single robo-advisor, it is understood to cover a substantial portion of the market. Prominent players such as Raisin, Scalable Capital, Growney, and Visualvest, identified by ExtraETF as the largest providers, were included in the Fondsconsult analysis.
The study categorized strategies into four risk classes: defensive portfolios with a maximum of 40 percent equities and a significant bond allocation, up to offensive strategies that can be fully invested in equities. Returns were reported before administrative fees.

Top Performers in Offensive Strategies
Among the offensive portfolios with the highest equity allocation, Ginmon emerged as a top performer, with its conventional strategy achieving a 14.3 percent gain in 2025. Following closely were an offensive strategy from Minveo and a sustainability-focused portfolio from Cominvest, the robo-advisor arm of Commerzbank.
However, the performance spectrum for offensive strategies was wide. The weakest offensive portfolio in the study only managed a return of 0.7 percent, illustrating the considerable difference in outcomes. This disparity can be attributed to a multitude of factors, including asset allocation, sector bets, and the specific investment vehicles used.
Sustainability vs. Conventional Strategies
The Fondsconsult analysis also drew distinctions between strategies with and without a sustainability focus. In 2025, sustainable robo-strategies, across all risk levels, generally yielded lower returns compared to their conventional counterparts. This finding is consistent with broader market observations where ethical investing, while growing in popularity, has sometimes faced performance challenges relative to unrestricted investment approaches.

Over a three-year period, neither conventional nor sustainable offensive strategies, on average, managed to outperform the broad stock market. This suggests that while robo-advisors can offer competitive returns, achieving consistent market-beating performance requires careful strategy selection and a long-term perspective.
Overall Evaluation and Leading Providers
For a comprehensive assessment, Fondsconsult analyzed robo-advisor returns before administrative costs from 2023 to 2025. This analysis also incorporated risk metrics such as volatility and maximum drawdowns. Furthermore, qualitative factors like costs, service quality, and the breadth of product offerings were considered to assign an overall rating.
In the realm of conventional strategies, Minveo received the highest overall rating. The Munich-based fintech company utilizes artificial intelligence (AI) for short-term portfolio management, complementing its portfolio managers. AI has been a core component of Minveo’s risk management for an extended period. Lukas Welger-Merkel, an analyst at Fondsconsult, praised Minveo for its comparatively low portfolio volatility and its strong performance in the past year. Other conventional strategies that received positive evaluations included those from Quirion, the digital wealth manager of Quirin Bank, and Cominvest.
Among strategies with a sustainability focus, Cominvest again stood out. According to Wellner, Comdirect’s robo-advisor, Cominvest, was the only provider whose sustainable strategies outperformed its conventional strategies across nearly all risk levels. Comdirect attributed these differences to variations in gold positions and bond strategies.

Ginmon’s sustainable strategy also garnered praise from Fondsconsult, with Welger-Merkel citing its "above-average return-risk profile." Quirion’s sustainability-focused strategy was also highlighted by the analysts.
The Impact of Competition and Cost Pressures
The German robo-advisor market is characterized by intense competition. Providers not only vie against each other but also face pressure from neo-brokers like Trade Republic. This highly competitive environment has a direct positive impact on investors, as the pressure is driving down administrative fees. "The cost pressure has increased," stated Welger-Merkel.
This trend is evident in recent fee adjustments. According to Fondsconsult, Bevestor, the digital wealth manager of the Sparkassen, and Cominvest both reduced their administrative fees by 0.2 percentage points in the past year. This ongoing reduction in fees makes robo-advisor services more accessible and attractive to a wider range of investors.
The Future of Robo-Advisors: Personalization and AI

Looking ahead, financial experts see significant potential for further innovation in the robo-advisor sector. Professor Andreas Hackethal of Goethe University Frankfurt emphasized that "the greatest potential for robo-advisors lies in even more personalized portfolios." He believes that AI can deliver much more in this area in the future.
The trend towards more individualized investment solutions is already apparent. Previously, robo-advisors often offered a limited number of standardized strategies with few risk levels. Today, investors increasingly seek tailored products that can incorporate thematic funds or alternative investments like gold. This demand for customization is likely to spur further development in AI-driven portfolio management and personalized financial advice.
The market’s evolution suggests a future where robo-advisors will offer increasingly sophisticated and personalized investment solutions, driven by technological advancements and a competitive landscape that prioritizes investor value. As these platforms continue to mature, their ability to navigate market complexities and cater to individual investor needs will be crucial to their sustained success.
This article was originally published in June 2026. It was reviewed and updated with minor adjustments on July 7, 2026.







